Many of the dynamics influencing six-second television ad performance vary compared with longer commercials, according to a study in the Journal of Advertising Research (JAR).
Henry G. Wolf VII and Paul Donato, both from the Advertising Research Foundation (ARF), a trade body and the publisher of JAR, discussed this subject in Six-second advertisements on television: Best practices for capturing visual attention.
“Unlike with longer advertisements, for which daypart had the largest effect, daypart did not play a role in visual attention to sixes,” their study – spanning 3,000 six-second spots, as well as 15- and 30-second ads – reported.
“Instead, advertisement pairing and pod position” – namely, the placement of an ad in a series of spots – “both played an important role for sixes. Sixes had the best visual attention in solo pods, followed by first, last, and then middle position.”
Another finding: “Placing up to a total of four advertisements from one brand in the same program could increase attention to sixes,” they noted.
The ARF and TVision Insights, a company that measures TV viewability, utilised “computer vision” technology – which pairs tuning and audio data, tracks who is present in a room, and when their eyes are on the screen – from set-top boxes in producing these insights.
And the final dataset included 165,843 “observations” – that is, a national ad “playing on a television in one of 1,372 households where at least one six-second advertisement played during the period of data collection” and viewed by at least one person.
One knowledge point from this information related to time-shifted viewing on set-top boxes, which “tended to increase visual attention to sixes, whereas same-day viewing decreased visual attention for 30s and different-day viewing improved it for 15s”.
A more cautionary note emerged from the study, too, as 27% of all ads that played had “nobody in the room to see them” – indicating the limits of traditional set-top box data, and an important consideration for short-form spots.
“Analysis of these ‘invisible’ advertisements showed that sixes made up a greater proportion of invisible advertisements (11%) than advertisements played when someone was in the room (4%),” they wrote.
“This may be because it is easier to miss the entirety of a short advertisement than a longer advertisement. Moreover, sixes tended to be in solo or first position.”
This article first appeared in www.warc.com
Seeking to build and grow your brand using the force of consumer insight, strategic foresight, creative disruption and technology prowess? Talk to us at +9714 3867728 or mail: firstname.lastname@example.org or visit www.groupisd.com